Beyond the Diagnosis: Understanding Mental Health Through a Trauma-Informed Lens

In his bestselling book The Body Keeps the Score, psychiatrist and trauma researcher Dr. Bessel van der Kolk challenges us to reconsider the way we understand mental illness. One of his central arguments is that trauma plays a much more significant role in psychological suffering than our traditional diagnostic models have historically acknowledged.

Consider this possibility: an individual may inherit a genetic predisposition toward a particular psychiatric condition. That predisposition exists like a switch, waiting to be activated. Then, somewhere along the way, the individual experiences a traumatic event or a series of overwhelming experiences, and that switch gets flipped.

Of course, the relationship between biology, environment, and mental health is more complex than any single metaphor can capture. Not every psychiatric condition originates in trauma, and not everyone who experiences trauma develops a mental illness. Nevertheless, the relationship between our lived experiences and our psychological functioning deserves far more attention than it often receives.

One of my fundamental beliefs as a therapist is that every human behavior and experience makes sense within context.

Even the thoughts, emotions, and behaviors we find most troubling.

Even those that have been labeled pathological.

And yes, even symptoms as serious and complex as psychosis.

Understanding Symptoms Rather Than Simply Labeling Them

Van der Kolk raises important questions about the limitations of our current psychiatric diagnostic system.

Consider how medicine evolved with the development of germ theory. Before physicians understood the microorganisms responsible for many infectious diseases, they could identify patterns of symptoms and attempt to treat them without necessarily understanding what caused the illness.

In some respects, our understanding of mental health is still evolving in a similar way.

Our diagnostic system largely organizes psychiatric conditions into clusters of observable symptoms. When an individual meets certain criteria, we assign a diagnosis, which may then help guide treatment.

This approach has genuine value.

For many people, receiving a diagnosis is a moment of profound clarity. It provides language for experiences they have struggled to understand, offers validation, and helps them recognize that they are not alone. Diagnoses can also be useful in identifying appropriate treatment modalities, informing psychiatric medication decisions, and accessing needed services and accommodations.

But there is an important distinction between identifying a pattern of symptoms and understanding why those symptoms developed in the first place.

A diagnosis can tell us what someone is experiencing without necessarily telling us why.

And in my work as a trauma-focused relational therapist, that why matters tremendously.

What If Our Symptoms Are Trying to Protect Us?

One of the reasons I appreciate Internal Family Systems (IFS) therapy is its fundamentally non-pathologizing approach to human psychology.

IFS operates from the understanding that our internal world consists of different parts, each with its own perspectives, emotional experiences, and motivations.

Some of these parts carry painful experiences, vulnerable emotions, and unresolved wounds. Others take on protective roles, attempting to prevent us from encountering that pain again.

In IFS, we often refer to these protective parts as managers and firefighters.

Managers attempt to prevent emotional distress before it occurs. They may use strategies such as perfectionism, people-pleasing, hypervigilance, emotional withdrawal, or excessive control.

Firefighters respond when emotional distress has already been activated. Their strategies tend to be more immediate and sometimes extreme, including emotional numbing, impulsivity, substance use, or dissociation.

These strategies may create significant difficulties in a person's life. Yet from an IFS perspective, the parts employing them are not inherently bad or defective.

They are attempting to protect the individual, often using strategies that developed under circumstances when other options felt unavailable.

This perspective invites us to consider even more severe psychological symptoms through a compassionate and curious lens.

For example, psychosis is a complex experience that can involve multiple biological, psychological, and environmental factors. From a parts-informed perspective, we might explore whether certain aspects of an individual's experience relate to attempts to manage overwhelming fear, painful memories, or a reality that feels intolerable.

That does not mean all psychotic symptoms are protective responses to trauma, nor that parts work alone is an appropriate treatment for psychosis. These symptoms require careful clinical assessment and may warrant specialized psychiatric care.

However, even when symptoms are severe, I believe there is value in remaining curious about the person's internal experience rather than reducing them to a diagnosis.

Instead of simply asking, "How do we make this symptom stop?" we can also ask:

"What has this person experienced that might help us understand what is happening?"

"What purpose might this response have served?"

"What is this person's nervous system or internal system attempting to accomplish?"

These questions do not replace medical or psychiatric treatment. They expand our understanding of the person receiving it.

When a Diagnosis Becomes an Identity

There is another complication I have noticed in my clinical work.

Sometimes individuals become so closely identified with a psychiatric diagnosis that it begins to shape their understanding of who they are and what they believe is possible for themselves.

As psychological terminology has become increasingly common in our everyday cultural vocabulary, I've become particularly interested in the ways diagnostic language influences how people describe themselves.

Again, a diagnosis can be enormously validating. For some individuals, particularly those who have spent years struggling without an explanation, it can provide an important sense of identity, understanding, and community.

The concern arises when a diagnosis stops being a tool for understanding and becomes a perceived limitation on personal growth.

A person may begin to interpret their difficulties as fixed, unavoidable characteristics of their condition rather than considering whether some of those patterns might be responsive to treatment, healing, or the development of new skills.

They may come to believe that meaningful improvement is beyond their reach and resign themselves to managing an unsatisfactory status quo.

This is not to suggest that every psychiatric condition can be overcome through psychotherapy or that people can simply choose to stop experiencing symptoms. Some conditions are chronic, and ongoing treatment, medication, accommodations, and support may remain necessary.

But accepting the reality of a condition does not have to mean surrendering the possibility of growth.

I want my clients to understand that a diagnosis may describe something they experience, but it does not have to define the entirety of who they are or determine the limits of what their lives can become.

The Hidden Functions of Symptoms

Another concept worth exploring is what therapists sometimes refer to as secondary gains.

At first glance, the idea that someone might experience a benefit from a distressing psychiatric symptom can seem counterintuitive, perhaps even offensive.

After all, why would anyone benefit from something that causes them suffering?

But human psychology is complicated, and a symptom can create unintended benefits even while causing genuine distress.

For instance, anxiety might allow someone to avoid situations in which they fear rejection or failure. Emotional withdrawal might protect a person from the vulnerability of intimacy. A particular behavioral pattern might bring increased reassurance, attention, or caretaking from loved ones.

Sometimes a diagnosis can also become a way of explaining or excusing relational behaviors that cause harm to others.

None of this necessarily means that an individual is consciously manipulating others, intentionally maintaining symptoms, or fabricating their distress.

Quite often, these dynamics operate outside conscious awareness.

From a parts-work perspective, I become curious about what an individual might fear losing if a particular symptom or behavioral pattern were no longer present.

What vulnerability might they have to face?

What responsibility might become necessary?

What need is currently being met through this pattern, and is there a healthier way to meet it?

This is where compassion and accountability can exist together.

Understanding why a behavior developed does not mean excusing its impact. Rather, understanding its function may help an individual develop new ways of responding to their needs while taking greater responsibility for how their behavior affects themselves and others.

From Shame to Self-Leadership

In my therapy practice, I take a deliberately non-pathologizing approach to the thoughts, emotional experiences, and behavioral patterns that clients bring into my office.

I do not begin from the assumption that something within them is defective and needs to be eliminated.

Instead, I approach these experiences with curiosity.

What happened in this person's life that made this response necessary or understandable?

What is this pattern attempting to accomplish?

What might the part responsible for it be afraid would happen if it stopped?

Through parts work, we can often uncover meaningful context that helps explain behaviors clients have spent years criticizing, resisting, or feeling ashamed of.

And something rather remarkable can happen when we begin to understand these patterns differently.

Shame begins to soften.

An individual who has always considered themselves weak, difficult, broken, or fundamentally flawed may begin to recognize that some of their most frustrating behaviors developed as attempts to survive, adapt, or protect themselves.

That recognition can fundamentally change the relationship they have with their own internal world.

Instead of meeting an anxious part with frustration, they may begin to approach it with reassurance.

Instead of condemning a part that withdraws from intimacy, they may become curious about what vulnerability it fears.

Instead of fighting against a protective part, they may begin to understand what that part needs in order to feel safe enough to relinquish its extreme role.

In IFS, this creates opportunities for greater Self-leadership: the capacity to approach our internal experiences with curiosity, compassion, clarity, and confidence rather than becoming overwhelmed or controlled by them.

When protective parts begin to trust that the individual can respond to difficult experiences in new ways, they may no longer need to rely so heavily on the strategies that once seemed essential.

And that creates space for meaningful change.

You Are More Than Your Symptoms

I believe there is tremendous power in shifting the question from "What is wrong with me?" to "What happened, what did I learn to do to cope, and what might I need now?"

This does not mean rejecting psychiatric diagnoses, minimizing biological factors, or dismissing the important role that medication and other evidence-based treatments can play in mental health care.

It means remembering that the person is always more complex than the diagnosis.

It means recognizing that what appears dysfunctional in the present may have developed as an understandable response to circumstances in the past.

And it means making room for the possibility that a person can learn to relate differently to experiences that have long caused them suffering.

My goal as a therapist is not simply to help clients manage symptoms. It is to help them understand themselves more deeply, develop greater compassion for their internal experiences, and discover new possibilities for how they relate to themselves and the people they love.

Because when we begin to understand the context of our suffering, we can begin to release some of the shame surrounding it.

And when shame gives way to curiosity and compassion, we create space for something else.

Healing, growth, and the possibility of transformation.

---

At Alchemical Transformations Therapy, I offer trauma-focused relational therapy informed by Internal Family Systems and other therapeutic approaches. My work centers on helping individuals and couples understand the patterns shaping their emotional and relational experiences while creating opportunities for greater connection, self-compassion, and meaningful change.

Learn more at "www.alchemicaltransformationstherapy.com" (https://www.alchemicaltransformationstherapy.com).